DUI Convictions Rafael Espinoza Moreno

Posted on 26th January 2012 in DWI / DUI Convictions, DWI / DUI News

Rafael Espinoza Moreno, 27, was sentenced to 19 years and 8 months after pleading no contest to charges stemming from the Aug. 14 crash that killed Esmeralda Ramirez of Baldwin Park, prosecutors said.

Ramirez was walking to church with her boyfriend at about 2:30 p.m. when Moreno, who was later found to have a blood-alcohol level nearly twice the legal limit, lost control of the 2005 Jeep Laredo he was driving, travelling onto the sidewalk along Baldwin Park Boulevard near Stewart Street and fatally striking Ramirez, Baldwin Park police Lt. David Reynoso said.

Ramirez was pronounced dead at the scene.

"Alcohol and excessive speed were factors in this collision," Reynoso said. "Moreno had never been issued a California driver’s license but had previously received a citation for driving with no license and speeding. Moreno had also been previously deported and was in the country illegally at the time of the crime."

Moreno fled the crash scene and was found hiding about two blocks away, police said.

"It appears Moreno was in the process of telephoning his family members to pick him up so he can elude arrest," Reynoso said.

The crash occurred on Moreno’s birthday.

DUI Charges Anthony Brian Tecca

Posted on 17th January 2012 in DWI / DUI Charges, DWI / DUI News

Anthony Brian Tecca appeared before Judge Russell Fagg and pleaded not guilty to felony charges of DUI and four counts of criminal endangerment.

The judge allowed Tecca to remain free pending trial on a posted $10,000 bond. He also ordered Tecca to submit to electronic alcohol monitoring.

Tecca was arrested Jan. 7 shortly after 10 p.m. by officers checking on a report of a reckless driver in the area of Belvedere Drive. A motorist called police to report that the driver of a minivan had nearly struck parked cars and almost hit his vehicle head-on.

Officers found the minivan parked on Montclair Drive. Three children, ages 10, 9 and 7, were in the minivan.

Officers said Tecca showed signs of intoxication, performed poorly on a sobriety test and refused to provide a breath sample. A blood sample was taken after a judge issued a search warrant.

DUI ARRESTS ESCAMBIA COUNTY and SANTA ROSA COUNTY

Posted on 17th January 2012 in DWI / DUI Arrests, DWI / DUI News

DUI ARRESTS

ESCAMBIA COUNTY

The following motorists were charged Monday with driving under the influence. Names, ages and addresses were provided by the individuals.

Michael Scott Curtis, 29, 700 block of Marlinspike Drive.

Oliver Dewitt Reeve, 66, address unavailable.

SANTA ROSA COUNTY

The following motorists were charged Friday through Monday with driving under the influence. Names, ages and addresses were provided by the individuals.

Linda Bridges Collins, 56, 4500 block of Voyager Drive, Pensacola.

Eugene Carl Focarelli, 28, 2700 block of Eureka Lane, Pensacola.

Sean Michael Allen, 39, 2700 block of Riverside Landing, Navarre.

Joseph Michael Moghadam, 49, 4400 block of Chantilly Way, Milton.

DUI Charges Urbana man Michael Hughes

Posted on 17th January 2012 in DWI / DUI Charges, DWI / DUI News

That means if he’s convicted, Michael Hughes, 43, of the 2000 block of South Philo Road, faces a mandatory prison term of four to 15 years and it could be even longer because of his record.

Assistant State’s Attorney Chris Kanis said that about 3 a.m. Monday, Hughes went in the Circle K, 1809 N. Cunningham Ave., and asked the clerk to open the beer cooler. The clerk said he appeared intoxicated. When she declined to open the cooler, Hughes allegedly took a bottle of vodka, put it in his pants and left.

The clerk followed him out and made contact with a state trooper who was nearby. Hughes, who was in the driver’s seat of a car, admitted to the trooper he had driven to the store from his daughter’s house in Champaign.

Kanis said the trooper’s report said the trooper found the vodka under the seat. Hughes failed field sobriety tests and on a portable breath test, registered a blood-alcohol content of 0.25 percent, more than three times the limit for a motorist to be presumed intoxicated.

Kanis said even though Hughes is charged with a Class 1 felony DUI, he’s eligible for Class X sentencing of six to 30 years if convicted because of prior convictions. He was also charged with driving under revocation and retail theft.

Hughes also has pending in Champaign County charges of driving under the revocation and theft, which were lodged against him in 2011.

Court records show Hughes had DUI convictions in 1996, 2001, 2003 and 2006, Kanis said. He went to prison for the last three DUI convictions.

DUI Records: lower in California

Posted on 17th January 2012 in DWI / DUI Laws, DWI / DUI News

Over the past several years, law enforcement agencies across Santa Barbara County and California have intensified their efforts to stop impaired driving and the fatalities that sometimes result.

The effort has proved dizzyingly effective, with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recently announcing that DUI deaths in the state reached their lowest level ever in 2010. Statewide statistics are not yet available for 2011.

The state’s Office of Traffic Safety credited a record number of DUI checkpoints with helping the decline.

Peace officers in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties said they are successfully cracking down on impaired driving with a combination of education, enforcement and high visibility.

Checkpoints are a key part of that, they say, as are county-wide holiday crackdown operations throughout the year.

Statistics provided by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration indicate Santa Barbara County had eight DUI-related traffic fatalities in 2010, down from 14 in 2009, 19 in 2008, 22 in 2007 and 11 in 2006. Those include only crashes that involved a driver with a blood alcohol level greater than .08, the legal limit for adults 21 and over in California.

San Luis Obispo County had five DUI traffic fatalities in 2010, compared to 15 in 2009, 10 in 2008, 13 in 2007 and 16 in 2006.

“I think some of the education is sinking in to some of the population,” said Sgt. John Ploetz of the California Highway Patrol.

He said he believes saturation patrols, where officers look specifically for drivers under the influence, are most effective.

“You don’t know where an officer is. They’re out actively looking for the impaired driver,” Ploetz added.

According to the Office of Traffic Safety, 2010 marked the largest single yearly drop of DUI deaths in the past 14 years for California. In that year, 791 people were killed in DUI crashes on state roadways, compared to 950 in 2009.

Office of Traffic Safety Director Christopher J. Murphy said in a press release that a major milestone had been reached in the fight against drinking and driving.

“While we are elated by these figures, there were still 791 lives, futures and dreams that will never be fully realized. We cannot back off from our ultimate goal — toward zero deaths,” he said.

Local law enforcement officers weighed in on the way they believed their agencies and enforcement programs were affecting the statistics.

DUI arrest news Matthew Parker

Posted on 14th January 2012 in DWI / DUI Arrests, DWI / DUI News

Matthew Parker, 25, is accused of drunk driving, speeding, running a red light in Whittier and broadsiding another vehicle on Friday afternoon, reports City News Service. Parker was traveling westbound on Mulberry Drive at Laurel Avenue in his 2004 Toyota Highlander when the crash occurred around 1:10pm. The victim’s car is described as a 2005 Toyota Corolla, which was making a left turn from southbound Laurel Avenue to eastbound Mulberry Drive.

The suspect’s vehicle struck the Corolla where three-year-old Lany Castillo was seated. She was airlifted to USC Medical Center with major head trauma. The Corolla’s driver, Jorge Garcia, 55, and passenger, Estella Garcia, were also taken to the hospital. Estella suffered major injuries; Jorge’s injuries were minor. The couple are Lany’s grandparents.

Parker fled from the scene on foot but was found hiding in a nearby apartment complex on Carmenita Road. The passenger of the Highlander suffered minor injuries.

Detailed DUI /DWI Laws: State of Alabama, USA

Posted on 14th January 2012 in DWI / DUI Laws, DWI / DUI News

ALA CODE § 32-5A-191 : Alabama Code – Section 32-5A-191: DRIVING WHILE UNDER INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL, CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES, ETC
Search by Keyword or Citation

(a) A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle while:

(1) There is 0.08 percent or more by weight of alcohol in his or her blood;

(2) Under the influence of alcohol;

(3) Under the influence of a controlled substance to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving;

(4) Under the combined influence of alcohol and a controlled substance to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving; or

(5) Under the influence of any substance which impairs the mental or physical faculties of such person to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving.

(b) A person who is under the age of 21 years shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle if there is .02 percentage or more by weight of alcohol in his or her blood. The Department of Public Safety shall suspend or revoke the driver’s license of any person, including, but not limited to, a juvenile, child, or youthful offender, convicted or adjudicated of, or subjected to a finding of delinquency based on this subsection. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon the first violation of this subsection by a person whose blood alcohol level is between .02 and .08, the person’s driver’s license or driving privilege shall be suspended for a period of 30 days in lieu of any penalties provided in subsection (e) of this section and there shall be no disclosure, other than to courts, law enforcement agencies, and the person’s employer, by any entity or person of any information, documents, or records relating to the person’s arrest, conviction, or adjudication of or finding of delinquency based on this subsection.

All persons, except as otherwise provided in this subsection for a first offense, including, but not limited to, a juvenile, child, or youthful offender, convicted or adjudicated of, or subjected to a finding of delinquency based on this subsection shall be fined pursuant to this section, notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, and the person shall also be required to attend and complete a DUI or substance abuse court referral program in accordance with subsection (i).

(c)(1) A school bus or day care driver shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle while in performance of his or her duties if there is greater than .02 percentage by weight of alcohol in his or her blood. A person convicted pursuant to this subsection shall be subject to the penalties provided by this section except that on the first conviction the Director of Public Safety shall suspend the driving privilege or driver’s license for a period of one year.

(2) A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of a commercial motor vehicle as defined in 49 CFR Part 390.5 of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations as adopted pursuant to Section 32-9A-2, if there is .04 percentage or greater by weight of alcohol in his or her blood. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section, the commercial driver’s license or commercial driving privilege of a person convicted of violating this subdivision shall be suspended for the period provided in accordance with 49 CFR Part 383.51 or 49 CFR Part 391.15, as applicable, and the person’s regular driver’s license or privilege to drive a regular motor vehicle shall be governed by the remainder of this section if the person is guilty of a violation of another provision of this section.

(d) The fact that any person charged with violating this section is or has been legally entitled to use alcohol or a controlled substance shall not constitute a defense against any charge of violating this section.

(e) Upon first conviction, a person violating this section shall be punished by imprisonment in the county or municipal jail for not more than one year, or by fine of not less than six hundred dollars ($600) nor more than two thousand one hundred dollars ($2,100), or by both a fine and imprisonment. In addition, on a first conviction, the Director of Public Safety shall suspend the driving privilege or driver’s license of the person convicted for a period of 90 days.

(f) On a second conviction within a five-year period, a person convicted of violating this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than one thousand one hundred dollars ($1,100) nor more than five thousand one hundred dollars ($5,100) and by imprisonment, which may include hard labor in the county or municipal jail for not more than one year. The sentence shall include a mandatory sentence, which is not subject to suspension or probation, of imprisonment in the county or municipal jail for not less than five days or community service for not less than 30 days. In addition the Director of Public Safety shall revoke the driving privileges or driver’s license of the person convicted for a period of one year.

(g) On a third conviction, a person convicted of violating this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than two thousand one hundred dollars ($2,100) nor more than ten thousand one hundred dollars ($10,100) and by imprisonment, which may include hard labor, in the county or municipal jail for not less than 60 days nor more than one year, to include a minimum of 60 days which shall be served in the county or municipal jail and cannot be probated or suspended. In addition, the Director of Public Safety shall revoke the driving privilege or driver’s license of the person convicted for a period of three years.

(h) On a fourth or subsequent conviction, a person convicted of violating this section shall be guilty of a Class C felony and punished by a fine of not less than four thousand one hundred dollars ($4,100) nor more than ten thousand one hundred dollars ($10,100) and by imprisonment of not less than one year and one day nor more than 10 years. Any term of imprisonment may include hard labor for the county or state, and where imprisonment does not exceed three years confinement may be in the county jail. Where imprisonment does not exceed one year and one day, confinement shall be in the county jail. The minimum sentence shall include a term of imprisonment for at least one year and one day, provided, however, that there shall be a minimum mandatory sentence of 10 days which shall be served in the county jail. The remainder of the sentence may be suspended or probated, but only if as a condition of probation the defendant enrolls and successfully completes a state certified chemical dependency program recommended by the court referral officer and approved by the sentencing court. Where probation is granted, the sentencing court may, in its discretion, and where monitoring equipment is available, place the defendant on house arrest under electronic surveillance during the probationary term. In addition to the other penalties authorized, the Director of Public Safety shall revoke the driving privilege or driver’s license of the person convicted for a period of five years.

The Alabama habitual felony offender law shall not apply to a conviction of a felony pursuant to this subsection, and a conviction of a felony pursuant to this subsection shall not be a felony conviction for purposes of the enhancement of punishment pursuant to Alabama’s habitual felony offender law.

(i) In addition to the penalties provided herein, any person convicted of violating this section shall be referred to the court referral officer for evaluation and referral to appropriate community resources. The defendant shall, at a minimum, be required to complete a DUI or substance abuse court referral program approved by the Administrative Office of Courts and operated in accordance with provisions of the Mandatory Treatment Act of 1990, Sections 12-23-1 to 12-23-19, inclusive. The Department of Public Safety shall not reissue a driver’s license to a person convicted under this section without receiving proof that the defendant has successfully completed the required program.

(j) Neither reckless driving nor any other traffic infraction is a lesser included offense under a charge of driving under the influence of alcohol or of a controlled substance.

(k) Except for fines collected for violations of this section charged pursuant to a municipal ordinance, fines collected for violations of this section shall be deposited to the State General Fund; however, beginning October 1, 1995, of any amount collected over two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for a first conviction, over five hundred dollars ($500) for a second conviction within five years, over one thousand dollars ($1,000) for a third conviction within five years, and over two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a fourth or subsequent conviction within five years, the first one hundred dollars ($100) of that additional amount shall be deposited to the Alabama Chemical Testing Training and Equipment Trust Fund, after three percent of the one hundred dollars ($100) is deducted for administrative costs, and beginning October 1, 1997, and thereafter, the second one hundred dollars ($100) of that additional amount shall be deposited in the Impaired Drivers Trust Fund after deducting five percent of the one hundred dollars ($100) for administrative costs and the remainder of the funds shall be deposited to the State General Fund. Fines collected for violations of this section charged pursuant to a municipal ordinance where the total fine is paid at one time shall be deposited as follows: The first three hundred fifty dollars ($350) collected for a first conviction, the first six hundred dollars ($600) collected for a second conviction within five years, the first one thousand one hundred dollars ($1,100) collected for a third conviction, and the first two thousand one hundred dollars ($2,100) collected for a fourth or subsequent conviction shall be deposited to the State Treasury with the first one hundred dollars ($100) collected for each conviction credited to the Alabama Chemical Testing Training and Equipment Trust Fund and the second one hundred dollars ($100) to the Impaired Drivers Trust Fund after deducting five percent of the one hundred dollars ($100) for administrative costs and depositing this amount in the general fund of the municipality, and the balance credited to the State General Fund. Any amounts collected over these amounts shall be deposited as otherwise provided by law. Fines collected for violations of this section charged pursuant to a municipal ordinance, where the fine is paid on a partial or installment basis, shall be deposited as follows: The first two hundred dollars ($200) of the fine collected for any conviction shall be deposited to the State Treasury with the first one hundred dollars ($100) collected for any conviction credited to the Alabama Chemical Testing Training and Equipment Trust Fund and the second one hundred dollars ($100) for any conviction credited to the Impaired Drivers Trust Fund after deducting five percent of the one hundred dollars ($100) for administrative costs and depositing this amount in the general fund of the municipality. The second three hundred dollars ($300) of the fine collected for a first conviction, the second eight hundred dollars ($800) collected for a second conviction, the second one thousand eight hundred dollars ($1,800) collected for a third conviction, and the second three thousand eight hundred dollars ($3,800) collected for a fourth conviction shall be divided with 50 percent of the funds collected to be deposited to the State Treasury to be credited to the State General Fund and 50 percent deposited as otherwise provided by law for municipal ordinance violations. Any amounts collected over these amounts shall be deposited as otherwise provided by law for municipal ordinance violations. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, 90 percent of any fine assessed and collected for any DUI offense charged by municipal ordinance violation in district or circuit court shall be computed only on the amount assessed over the minimum fine authorized, and upon collection shall be distributed to the municipal general fund with the remaining 10 percent distributed to the State General Fund.

(l) A person who has been arrested for violating this section shall not be released from jail under bond or otherwise, until there is less than the same percent by weight of alcohol in his or her blood as specified in subsection (a)(1) or, in the case of a person who is under the age of 21 years, subsection (b) hereof.

(m) Upon verification that a defendant arrested pursuant to this section is currently on probation from another court of this state as a result of a conviction for any criminal offense, the prosecutor shall provide written or oral notification of the defendant’s subsequent arrest and pending prosecution to the court in which the prior conviction occurred.

(n) When any person over the age of 21 years is convicted pursuant to this section and a child under the age of 14 years was present in the vehicle at the time of the offense, the defendant shall be sentenced to double the minimum punishment that the person would have received if the child had not been present in the motor vehicle.

(o) A prior conviction within a five-year period for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs from this state, a municipality within this state, or another state or territory or a municipality of another state or territory shall be considered by a court for imposing a sentence pursuant to this section.

(p) Any person convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol, or a controlled substance, or both, or any substance which impairs the mental or physical faculties in violation of this section, a municipal ordinance adopting this section, or a similar law from another state or territory or a municipality of another state or territory more than once in a five-year period shall have his or her motor vehicle registration for all vehicles owned by the repeat offender suspended by the Alabama Department of Revenue for the duration of the offender’s driver’s license suspension period, unless such action would impose an undue hardship to any individual, not including the repeat offender, who is completely dependent on the motor vehicle for the necessities of life, including any family member of the repeat offender and any co-owner of the vehicle.

(Acts 1980, No. 80-434, p. 604, §9-102; Acts 1981, No. 81-803, p. 1412, §1; Acts 1983, No. 83-620, p. 959, §1; Acts 1984, No. 84-259, p. 431, §1; Acts 1994, No. 94-590, p. 1089, §1; Acts 1995, No. 95-784, p. 1862, §2; Acts 1996, No. 96-341, p. 416, §1; Acts 1996, No. 96-705, p. 1174, §1; Acts 1997, No. 97-556, p. 985, §1; Act 99-432, p. 787, §1; Act 2000-677, p. 1376, §1; Act 2002-502, p. 1299, §1; Act 2005-326, p. 795, 1st Sp. Sess., §1; Act 2006-654, p. 1787, §1.)

DUI Charges veteran media executive and former Tribune Co. chief executive Randy Michaels

Posted on 13th January 2012 in DWI / DUI Charges, DWI / DUI News

Randy Michaels was arrested in October in Middletown. Court officials said a prosecutor withdrew the driving under the influence charge Friday, and Michaels pleaded guilty to driving into a closed street. He was fined $30 and court costs.

His attorney, Steve Adams, says Michaels was not under the influence of alcohol and was innocent.

Police had reported that an officer spotted Michaels’ vehicle in a construction area and that he smelled of alcohol.

DUI Charges news

Posted on 11th January 2012 in DWI / DUI Charges, DWI / DUI News

John Medeiros, now 59, is charged in connection with the death of 39-year-old Dwayne Bradley.

In October 2010, Medeiros was driving a 2000 Cadillac Deville and collided with a motorcycle as he was making a left turn onto Northeast 77th Street. Bradley, the driver of the motorcycle, was taken to Shands at the University of Florida in Gainesville that night, where he was pronounced deceased.

According to police reports, Medeiros was visibly intoxicated at the scene. His driver’s license had been revoked for a previous DUI manslaughter charge. The 2010 charge was his second in two years.

An unshaven Medeiros, wearing a faded jail uniform, appeared in court Wednesday for a hearing. His defense attorney, Melanie Slaughter, planned to review with him a redacted recorded jail interview he had with authorities, which will be introduced in court next week.

Medeiros faces up to 30 years in prison. He has turned down plea deals from the State Attorney’s Office for 15-year and 20-year sentences.

DUI arrest News Former York County Councilman Paul Lindemann

Posted on 10th January 2012 in DWI / DUI Arrests, DWI / DUI News

Former York County Councilman Paul Lindemann was charged with driving under the influence and leaving the scene of an accident after he struck a mailbox with a vehicle and ran away, authorities say. Lindemann, who was elected twice to represent Fort Mill on York County Council, was booked at Moss Justice Center just before 7 a.m. Tuesday. His bond was set at $1,234.50, and his first court appearance is Feb. 6.
Lindemann, 32, was involved in a one vehicle wreck in Fort Mill around 1:45 a.m., said Lance Cpl. Billy Elder of the Highway Patrol. The patrol responded to Commons Court in Fort Mill’s Baxter Village, where a vehicle had struck a mailbox.
A 2003 Lexus SUV was traveling southbound on Commons Court, when the vehicle swerved off the road to the right and struck a mailbox, Elder said.
The driver, later identified as Lindemann, fled the vehicle on foot and was arrested soon after, Elder said.
The highway patrol previously released Lindemann’s home address, 1312 Hensley Road, as the site of the crash.
Lindemann didn’t take a breathalyzer test, which could mean he either refused to take it or couldn’t blow enough air, Judge Dan Malphrus said during his bond hearing.